« NL - Lankhorst Pure Composites v. Samsonite Europe | Main | Young EPLAW - Reminder »

19/04/2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The patent was not murdered twice for the same reason... but for insufficiency of disclosure...

The comments to this entry are closed.

Categories

EPLAW Patent Blog sponsors:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner