« UK - Nokia v. IPCom | Main | DE - AGA Medical Corporation v Occlutech »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The advocate states "I am of the opinion that the extension of the duration by six months does not commence as of the expiration of the patent, but as of the entry into force of the supplementary protection certificate, which is determined in such way that from the expiration of the patent the (negative) duration of the certificate is substracted.” Following this reasoning, how a PED SPC can come into force if SPC NEVER will come into force because is materially impossible?

The comments to this entry are closed.


EPLAW Patent Blog sponsors:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner