« UK - ISCC v Comptroller General of Patents | Main | UK - Merck v. Sigma »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It would be interesting to see a full comparison to the recent T1222/11


It appears they may be using a different test in deciding whether partial priority should be given for a generic claim i.e. whether a claim "represents a limited number of clearly defined alternative subject-matters"

The comments to this entry are closed.


EPLAW Patent Blog sponsors:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner